Constantine Chernobyl Comments #4

He finally responded to my comments. Time to respond back to some of this. I'll probably make a special post for one of his little bitch lackeys fwanksajerk (appropriate name) anyway lets begin.

Constantine Chernobyl posted a comment:

"You do realize that it's up to AVGN to make his movie as expensive as he wants and he truly did renege on him asking only for $75,000 when he saw people are gullible enough to donate more."

First of all, he didn't renege on anything, he was surprised when he reached that amount so quickly. 

Secondly, he said they could choose to donate more if they wanted to. It isn't gullibility if they willingly donate.

Edit: CC doesn't pay attention:

"Exactly. That only means that AVGN is greedy enough to double-dip and make his fanbase pay for a movie twice. :D"

He didn't make his fans pay, some of them WILLINGLY chose to donate, James Rolfe did not say at any point after he reached his goal that they "had to" donate, he said they could "choose to" donate. there's a big difference in having to donate, and choosing to donate.

Constantine Chernobyl posted a comment:

"AVGN had his fan base produce the movie. Instead of offering it for free to them after they already paid for it, he's planning to have it shown on cinemas or on DVD form, thus effectively selling the product to them twice. Use your brain."

First off, if they willingly donated money to this, don't you think they would willingly pay for a movie ticket and/or DVD?

Second, the movie is gonna get uploaded to YouTube eventually. (which you'll probably do one of two things. either support this because you hate James Rolfe, or get butthurt over this because in your words we are being "leeches")

Edit: CC is quick to assume:

"Which means AVGN is going to get more money from ad revenue? So he's essentially making his fanbase pay for a movie thrice? :D

Whoever said James Rolfe is gonna upload it? anyone of his fans could upload the movie on to YouTube. and with adblock on, it'll be good times.

Constantine Chernobyl posted a comment:

"I love how if AVGN doesn't revise his videos, he "doesn't have time", but if IG revises his videos, people still mock him and say, "Busted!" and whatnot."

That's because unlike James Rolfe, Chris Bores does half assed revisions with almost no changes. Look at James Rolfe's Dick Tracy, Virtual Boy and Indiana Jones revisions. That's how you should revise videos.

CC is so not thinking clearly:


"His revision of Dick Tracy is also half-assed in that he has yet to address the fact that the snipers kills him easily because he's playing the game wrong. Sorry, dude. Checkmate. :D"

look dude James Rolfe may not be that skilled with games, but he doesn't review these games because of that. he reviews games to point out their flaws. we leave shit like that to people like The Completionist (http://www.youtube.com/user/ThatOneVideoGamer) Chris Bores has the unfortunate mishap of being both unskilled at games, and unskilled at reviewing them. 

that's all I can do for now folks, have a nice day.